STOP Verizon and ATT from Controlling ALL Spectrum
Monday, March 26, 2012
Stop Verizon Deal - Competitor Lockout. Verizon and ATT are Behind Lightsquared being Stalled, Stopped. Speak Out, Lightsquared is your answer to Internet Everywhere and STOP the Monopoly
"Watch Free Press Policy Adviser Joel Kelsey Testify in Front of Congress Against the Verizon Deal
Verizon has struck a sweetheart deal with a cartel of cable companies — including Comcast, Time Warner Cable and Cox Communications — in which they've agreed to stop competing against one another.1The new plan? To gouge consumers and divvy up the spoils of the broadband market.
Whether you use a mobile phone or a desktop computer to access the Internet, this deal is bad news. We need online communications to be affordable and open to all.
Take action to urge Congress to stand up for broadband competition, and to reject this deal outright.
1. "Verizon to Buy Cox Spectrum to Remake Its Broadband Model," GigaOm, Dec. 16, 2011: http://gigaom.com/broadband/verizon-to-buy-cox-spectrum-to-remake-its-broadband-model/"
Verizon is Determined to Kill Off ALL Connection. Verizon is Behind the STOPPING of Lightsquared Moving Forward.
"Nearly 20,000 people have told Congress to block Verizon's sweetheart deal to divide up access to the Internet with Comcast, Cox and Time Warner Cable." This From FreePress.nt and the Free Press Action Fund, as well as Save the Internet.com
" .. this deal would "put former rivals on the path to cooperation, not competition" — and that it would hurt Americans' ability to get online.
Sen. Al Franken and a few other committee colleagues agreed. "It's almost as if your companies got in a room together, and you agreed to throw in the towel and stop competing against each other," Franken told representatives from Verizon and the cable companies."
Verizon is behind the Stopping of Lightsquared, which would give Internet Access to all, even the remotest of rural communities.
If Lightsquared is not able to "Open for Business", this will create a Monopoly and Verizon is behind it. Now Verizon is making other deals to buy Spectrum.
". "Verizon to Buy Cox Spectrum to Remake Its Broadband Model," GigaOm, Dec. 16, 2011: http://act2.freepress.net/go/8979?akid=3386.9407824.-O3Lfg&t=14"
"
" .. this deal would "put former rivals on the path to cooperation, not competition" — and that it would hurt Americans' ability to get online.
Sen. Al Franken and a few other committee colleagues agreed. "It's almost as if your companies got in a room together, and you agreed to throw in the towel and stop competing against each other," Franken told representatives from Verizon and the cable companies."
Verizon is behind the Stopping of Lightsquared, which would give Internet Access to all, even the remotest of rural communities.
STOP the Monopoly that Verizon is
Trying to Create by pushing to STOP Lightsquared.
If Lightsquared is not able to "Open for Business", this will create a Monopoly and Verizon is behind it. Now Verizon is making other deals to buy Spectrum.
". "Verizon to Buy Cox Spectrum to Remake Its Broadband Model," GigaOm, Dec. 16, 2011: http://act2.freepress.net/go/8979?akid=3386.9407824.-O3Lfg&t=14"
"
  | ||
Dear Crystal, Your cable and wireless companies are getting into bed together. And while it might be a cozy arrangement for them, it's bad news for the rest of us. Verizon has struck a deal with a cartel of cable companies — including Comcast, Time Warner Cable and Cox Communications — to stop competing against one another. They want to divvy up the spoils of the growing mobile market for themselves so they can continue gouging consumers without the threat of competition.1 Whether you use a mobile phone or a desktop computer to access the Internet, this deal will hurt you. Verizon is already the largest wireless provider in a consolidated market. If there's no competition to keep carriers in check, prices will continue to spiral upwards and services will decline. The Senate Antitrust Committee is holding a hearing on Verizon's shenanigans on Wednesday. I will be there testifying before Congress on your behalf. But I need you to show your opposition to this deal: If this deal goes through, the cable giants will hand Verizon a giant chunk of the public airwaves, allowing the company to grow even bigger while its wireless competitors wither away. In return, Verizon will promise not to eat into the cable cartel's broadband business. If this deal is approved, the United States will fall even farther behind the rest of the world in broadband adoption, speed and affordability. Sky-high wireless and broadband bills will rise even higher, even if you're not a Verizon or cable-cartel customer. And even fewer people will be able to afford Internet access. These companies aren't talking about trading sports players back and forth. The product they're trading is our very ability to access information and engage in our democracy. Do you want Verizon to have this kind of power? Speak up now and tell Congress to block Verizon's deal with big cable. The future of the Internet is too important to be left to a handful of giant companies. I will go before the Senate on Wednesday to help make sure Washington hears from you. Please take action to show Congress we mean business. Thanks, Joel Kelsey www.freepress.net" Send Via Email, STOP Verizon. Call your Congressman and Speak Out for Lightsquared. |
Friday, February 17, 2012
David Carr of the New York Times pretending to do investigative reporting, yet David Carr LIES, turns victims into criminals. And my Guess is the Philadelphia Media Network CEO Greg Osberg story is not Different. David Carr is a PROVEN Liar, and has No accountability for his LIES.
This is Ridiculous, you Shouldn't Lie to David Carr, what a Crock of Shit that Is.
David Carr Flat Out Lies, Sides with Criminals, Does not have one objective part in his stories and my guess is that David Carr is on the wrong side of the law and the WRONG side of the Moral Compass in this one as well.
I will Soon Sue David Carr for Defamation and So Should Greg Osberg. As David Carr spoke to me, and knew the other side to the story, and though I already was served up a $2.5 Million Dollar Judgement and plenty of hate, David Carr of the New York Times served me up some more by deliberately defaming me, all to protect corporate greed and the abuse of government programs at the taxpayers expense. Why trash an investigative blogger doing what he does, talking to sources and posting a story?
I guess David Carr does not have much stomach for investigative bloggers as David Carr does not have a clue how to investigate a story and David Carr simply listens to the yammers of alleged spineless, ball-less, nameless sources instead of reading documents, reading contracts and looking at the real proof of the story that does not come from the mouth of the SIDE that Dave Carr of the New York Times Decides to take.
Below is from the Jim Romenesko Blog - The Title Really Got me as David Carr is a Liar, I told David Carr the TRUTH and he Printed the LIE. So it does not matter what you tell David Carr of the New York Times, David Carr will twist the TRUTH, the Documented Facts to support his own lying agenda and to keep the wall of corruption firmly in place.
Here is the Article:
"YOU SHOULDN’T LIE TO DAVID CARR AND NYT"
"....Amy Chozick and David Carr’s New York Times story on the Philadelphia newspapers saga.
New York Times reporters David Carr and Amy Chozick started working on their Philadelphia newspapers story on Sunday, and heard “persistent reports” of a meeting taking place during which Philadelphia Media Network CEO Greg Osberg told editors that he’d be overseeing articles about the impending sale of the Inquirer and Daily News."
"“I got in touch with [PMN spokesman] Mark Block on Tuesday,” Carr says in a phone interview. “He was spinning some, but he was helpful and direct and he was also trying to keep his boss’s exposure sort of at a minimum. I knew Osberg from his time at Newsweek and had always had good dealings with him. I heard some bad things [from Philadelphia sources], but I had an open mind about talking with him.”
By Wednesday morning, Chozick and Carr had multiple sources confirming Osberg’s meeting with editors, and the two knew they were going to use it in their story. “So that was one of my first questions [to Osberg]: ‘Did you hold the meeting with the three editors?’ and he said no. I said, ‘You know this is going to be in the newspaper, so I’m going to give you one freebie. I’m going to give you a chance to amend that answer.’”
Again, Osberg denied there was meeting.
Just before ending the interview, Carr gave Osberg yet another opportunity to admit that the meeting took place. He wouldn’t do it.
Carr says: “I asked Amy afterwards, ‘Do you think he choked? Why did he do that?’ We really couldn’t figure it out because word of that meeting was all over the building.”
"Later Wednesday afternoon, Philadelphia Daily News editor Larry Platt said on the record that the meeting took place. “He wouldn’t go into details,” says Carr, “but those we already had.”
Carr then told Block in an email that Platt confirmed the meeting that Osberg said never took place.
“He said, ‘What time are you closing?’ I said 7:30, and so at 7:50 he sent me a 200-word statement from Osberg acknowledging that the meeting had taken place.”
Here is Osberg’s statement to the Times reporters, time-stamped 7:56 p.m.:
I made it very clear in this February 7 meeting, that I was not suggesting ever taking control of the editorial process, nor was I planning to change any reporting policies going forward. Any suggestions to the contrary of that position are categorically denied, as I stated to you during our interview this morning.
What I did tell the editors that attended this meeting is that I would like to be advised before any articles are published on the subject of Philadelphia Media Network’s possible sale, so that as Publisher, I would not be blind-sided by a story publicly, without receiving advance notice. In view of the sensitive subject matter of the sale, as Publisher, I would have the prerogative to make such a request and it would not be uncommon to receive such notification.
Carr called the desk — after his deadline — and told editors about the statement. They were able to add a sentence to the story.
“It made me angry,” says the reporter. “I don’t know if I’ve ever been through something like that before: No, it didn’t happen; no, it didn’t happen; no, it didn’t happen; and then, yes it did.”
“I was angry.”
Source of David Carr Gibberish.
http://jimromenesko.com/2012/02/16/you-shouldnt-lie-to-david-carr-and-nyt/
David Carr was angry? Who gives a Shit?
I show 3 years of possible corruption and David Carr is so blind to the real story that he does not investigate any part of it and instead discriminates against a female blogger whom was exposing corruption in the US bankruptcy courts. David Carr has no right to say I am angry, and all the other cock and bull David Carr is blathering as news. I am the One who should be angry and so should the other victims of David Carr's Lies. As he has ruined lives with no remorse and acts angry over this, what a crock. David Carr does NOT investigate a story and David Carr listens to the yammer of sources such as liar Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group and his attorney David Aman of Tonkon Torp BOTH of whom were involved in the Summit Bankruptcy Scandal. Which David Carr did not even bother to look into.
David Carr, "heard “persistent reports” What? that sure sounds full of shit, I gave David Carr leads to documented proof on my story. David Carr of the New York Times Sure seems to believe the scuddle, the persistent voices of non-authority over documented proof. David Carr of the New York Times is an idiot at best.
David Carr Bullshit Regarding the Greg Osberg Scandal
"“I got in touch with [PMN spokesman] Mark Block on Tuesday,” Carr says in a phone interview. “He was spinning some, but he was helpful and direct" Says the Article above, what a Crock this is .. David Carr spins and spins and turns victims into criminals with out ANY reading of documented facts. David Carr is so full of shit, I was "helpful and direct" and honest, and David Carr of the New York Times Flat out Lied about me. David Carr is a classic case of you can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink. As David Carr is shown proof, documentation and still goes with the LIE over the Documented Evidence.
"By Wednesday morning, Chozick and Carr had multiple sources confirming Osberg’s meeting with editors, and the two knew they were going to use it in their story.." Again what a bunch of bullshit, multiple "sources", I gave David Carr leads to documented proof and David Carr uses the blathering of alleged facts from the mouths of supposed "multiple sources" to ruin this guys reputation, and in the name of what? protecting whom?
The article goes on to say "I said, ‘You know this is going to be in the newspaper, so I’m going to give you one freebie. I’m going to give you a chance to amend that answer.’”", I say what a Fuck Head David Carr is, one chance to amend your answer, then he will ruin your life with no proof. David Carr is a lying asshole, with agendas that are NOT of the Public Interest. Do not ever TRUST getting your news from the LIES of David Carr.
*"Carr says: “I asked Amy afterwards, ‘Do you think he choked? Why did he do that?’ We really couldn’t figure it out because word of that meeting was all over the building.”"
Gossip and Blather, that's news to the Lying alleged "Journalist" David Carr of the New York Times, office clatter is NEWS to ex druggies like David Carr who cannot read documented proof. David Carr relies on gossip and word of mouth for his story, and David Carr refuses to READ and investigate FACTS.
Documentation, Depositions, Videos, Contracts, Tax Information, and more were available regarding the Truth about Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group, but instead of looking into the story David Carr of the New York Times simply trashed me, lied about me and though word, documented word was all over the WORLD regarding Kevin Padrick, David Carr simply took his side over Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox and chose to defame her, me, without investigating easy to read documented proof.
David Carr flat out LIED saying that there was no one else who had issue with Obsidian Finance Group or Kevin Padrick and that seems to be protected by Law. I expose real corruption and tell the TRUTH and am not protected by Law as media, but David Carr of the New York Times, flat out lies, KNOWINGLY about me, Crystal Cox Blogger and there is no protection for me, as the Law protects the LIES of David Carr. Gee.. um I snorted to much cocaine and really believed my source.. your honor.. wa la no accountability for Dipshit David Carr to ruin lives, careers and run amok.
Let's See one of the worlds biggest Law Firms, a Billion Dollar Solar and Finance company sues a penniless blogger and Dumb Ass David Carr does not look into the Financial Companies and Lawyers but instead lets my clients, family, friends and the world believe I am an extortionist, that I attacked an innocent many with the power of my blogs and David Carr lied flat out claiming he looked into it and there was no other issues with this man, Kevin Padrick. All flat out lies, meanwhile EVIL David Carr is using the power of his voice at the New York Times to to ruin lives, families, careers, quality of life, credibility and without really reading documents or studying anything but simply listening the yammer across is phone heard through the woman hating, prejudices, discriminated, biased ears of New York Times Ignorant Reporter David Carr.
See David Carr took the Word Of Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group. David Carr interviewed me himself and did not print my side. This article talks of several sources that told David Carr of a secret meeting? Does Dave Carr of the NYT's have to name all these sources? See I had 3 years of documented sources, depositions, videos, court cases, videos of Kevin Padrick at meetings, news articles, tax documents, contracts and more and David Carr of the New York Times took this Evidence and told his readers that there was no reason for what I wrote about Kevin Padrick. David Carr defamed me, on purpose, after talking to me. With 3 years of documented sources, depositions, videos, court cases, videos of Kevin Padrick at meetings, news articles, tax documents, contracts available online, David Carr flat out lied to protect Kevin Padrick by saying the Truth Wins, and saying there was no one else with issue with Kevin Padrick when you can easily read that there is plenty of documentation to prove that my story had 3 years worth of merit.
DO not Trust David Carr of the New York Times and his Secret Sources, as David Carr Flat Out Lies to protect criminals and has no investigative skills.
David Carr of the New York Times talked about my writings on my home town of Lincoln County Montana, and my Montana corruption writings and instead of looking into a massive wall of corruption in Montana that involves the top politicians and drug companies in the world, David Carr simply slammed an investigative blogger reporting on the story.
David Carr trash talks my writings exposing Proskauer Rose Law Firm and Ex Supreme Court Judge Judith Kaye yet David Carr does not look into massive amounts of documented proof.
David Carr trash talks my stories of Time Warner CEO Jeffrey Bewkes and of CEO of Intel Paul Otellini yet David Car refuses to investigated the documented proof.
I have not dug into the Greg Osberg story as I am swamped right now. However, I am betting that David Carr is the Asshole in this one. Seems like a petty story, that is regarding the career of David Carr and personal issues to me. Yet David Carr ignores a story such as the many I write on that affect the public at large in a very real way.
Do you have a tip on the David Carr smackdown of Greg Osberg? What is the Truth about Greg Osberg, my guess is the Truth is the Exact opposite of what lying asshole David Carr suggest. As I personally told David Carr the TRUTH in my case and David Carr lied to the world about me, Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox. David Carr of the New York Times used his power, not for the good to investigate corruption in the New York Courts that I Blog about, not write on the SEC Corruption I post on, not to investigate the massively corrupt Proskauer Rose Law Firm or the whitewashing in the New York Justice System, not to Investigate the iViewit Stolen Technology, nor to look into the real story of Lightsquared, Philip Falcone and those who set him up to keep Clearwire and Verizon in Business.
See David Carr of the New York Times is a Spineless, Ball-Less Ex Cocaine Head, who cannot think for himself and instead let's big money tell him what to say. David Carr of the New York Times does not have the authority to speak the Truth, for David Carr of the New York Times is a whipping boy for big media and to protect the wall of corruption that big media like the New York Time protects.
I, Crystal Cox Blogger am TRULY independent, I get tips daily because I am very good at search engine placement. I read documents and investigate stories in a way that Spineless, Asshole David Carr of the New York Times simply cannot because he has a BOSS, he has Ad Dollars, Politics and Big Media to Answer to and I answer to NO One.
Expose the Lying, Life Ruining Weasel David Carr - Email me all the DIRT, documents, videos and indescresions. As David Carr of the New York Times, thinks it prudent to lie about me, defame me and make me look like a criminal when really I am the voice for the victims of big corporations, bankruptcy courts, corrupt judge and lawyers and I am the REAL Independent, NOT bought and Paid for Media that tells more of the truth than David Carr dare to.
David Carr of the New York Times is weak and rely's on bad information and his own Ego to write his stories and posts no proof of documents or "Reality". Do NOT ever Trust a Story from Dave Carr - David Carr of the New York Times.
Dipshit David Carr lied about the WRONG Investigative Blogger. And now the Obsidian V. Cox LIES and blathers of David Carr of the New York Times will be his Online Legacy.
David Carr of the New York Times answers to Big Media and David Carr of the New York Times does not tell you the truth, the whole TRUTH and Nothing But. David Carr of the New York Times uses his power to ruin lives instead of truly investigate stories and make the world a better place for the greater good. David Carr of the New York Times lies about me, defamed me, trash talked me and FAILED to investigate the document proof of my 3 year old story. I will EXPOSE every indiscrestion of David Carr of the New York Times, every late night romp, every video and document I receive, every secret that David Carr of the New York Times wants to hide, I will make sure that this information is found in the search engines.
Got a David Carr of the New York Times story, video, or any information .. DIRT on David Carr of the New York Times ? Email it to Me, I am Blogger Crystal Cox and I will EXPOSE David Carr no matter what, even if the Liars, Thugs and Thieves murder me, I still have bloggers in place to take over where I leave off and EXPOSE every dirty trick, dirty deed, perverted thought, illegal action, and well pretty much EVERY Single Thing regarding David Carr of the New York Times.
Defame Me, Lie About Me, Discredit me to my family, friends, and the world and the truth is I give voice to victims, expose whitewashing for elite law firms, expose bankruptcy courts, expose judges and those who create victims and David Carr of the New York Times sides with the wall of corruption and without investigative any documents of evidence.
Research links on documented Proof of Corruption involving Intel Corp., Proskauer Rose Law Firm, Foley and Lardner Law Firm including Michael Grebe, USPTO Corruption, New York Court Corruption, Warner Bros. Corruption, Lockheed Martin Corruption, CEO Jeffrey Bewkes, CEO Paul Otellini, MPEG LA and more tech companies, media companies, and law firms as well as US courts in the stealing of a 13 Trillion Dollar Technology ~ the iViewit Technology.
David Carr of the New York Times cannot read and his brain was gone long ago with all the Cocaine he snorted, so you will have to research the stories yourself, instead of simply believing me bad, wrong, defaming or in some way harming the innocent. Think for Yourself and DO NOT believe David Carr of the New York Times.
Over 1200 documents of Proof and Dumb Ass David Carr of the New York Times simply states that Blogger Crystal Cox is defaming and there you have it, no research, no documents linked or proven just the word of a cocaine head, woman hating, blogger hating "alleged" journalist ...
Do your Homework.
http://www.deniedpatent.com/
http://iviewit.tv/
http://www.josephleccese.com/
http://www.jeffreybewkes.com/
http://www.alexisdevane.com/
http://www.paulotellini.info/
http://intelcorruption.blogspot.com/
http://www.douglaschey.com/
David Carr of the New York Times flat out lies to protect Elite Lawyers, New York Corruption, and Big Media. David Carr is part of the PROBLEM and not the SOLUTION in the Culture of Corruption.
Got a Dipshit David Carr Tip, Email your David Carr tip to investigative blogger Crystal L. Cox - Crystal@CrystalCox.com .
EXPOSE David Carr of the New York Times - I am Dedicated to exposing David Carr of the New York Times, please email me your tips regarding David Carr of the New York Times.
David Carr of the New York Times has made and ENEMY for Life, in Me, Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox, by not bothering to Investigate a story and ruining lives with total disregard for the facts of the matter, and with complete lack of accountability.
David Carr of the New York Times is an asshole, indeed and David Carr of the New York Times has the power to of big Corrupt Media behind him with total disregard for the public at large and bringing down the wall of corruption in the US court system that protects big corporations, elite lawyers and liars like Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group.
David Carr Flat Out Lies, Sides with Criminals, Does not have one objective part in his stories and my guess is that David Carr is on the wrong side of the law and the WRONG side of the Moral Compass in this one as well.
 |
| David Carr is the Pencil Neck on the Left |
I guess David Carr does not have much stomach for investigative bloggers as David Carr does not have a clue how to investigate a story and David Carr simply listens to the yammers of alleged spineless, ball-less, nameless sources instead of reading documents, reading contracts and looking at the real proof of the story that does not come from the mouth of the SIDE that Dave Carr of the New York Times Decides to take.
Below is from the Jim Romenesko Blog - The Title Really Got me as David Carr is a Liar, I told David Carr the TRUTH and he Printed the LIE. So it does not matter what you tell David Carr of the New York Times, David Carr will twist the TRUTH, the Documented Facts to support his own lying agenda and to keep the wall of corruption firmly in place.
Here is the Article:
"YOU SHOULDN’T LIE TO DAVID CARR AND NYT"
"....Amy Chozick and David Carr’s New York Times story on the Philadelphia newspapers saga.
New York Times reporters David Carr and Amy Chozick started working on their Philadelphia newspapers story on Sunday, and heard “persistent reports” of a meeting taking place during which Philadelphia Media Network CEO Greg Osberg told editors that he’d be overseeing articles about the impending sale of the Inquirer and Daily News."
"“I got in touch with [PMN spokesman] Mark Block on Tuesday,” Carr says in a phone interview. “He was spinning some, but he was helpful and direct and he was also trying to keep his boss’s exposure sort of at a minimum. I knew Osberg from his time at Newsweek and had always had good dealings with him. I heard some bad things [from Philadelphia sources], but I had an open mind about talking with him.”
 |
| David Carr, New York Times |
By Wednesday morning, Chozick and Carr had multiple sources confirming Osberg’s meeting with editors, and the two knew they were going to use it in their story. “So that was one of my first questions [to Osberg]: ‘Did you hold the meeting with the three editors?’ and he said no. I said, ‘You know this is going to be in the newspaper, so I’m going to give you one freebie. I’m going to give you a chance to amend that answer.’”
Again, Osberg denied there was meeting.
Just before ending the interview, Carr gave Osberg yet another opportunity to admit that the meeting took place. He wouldn’t do it.
Carr says: “I asked Amy afterwards, ‘Do you think he choked? Why did he do that?’ We really couldn’t figure it out because word of that meeting was all over the building.”
"Later Wednesday afternoon, Philadelphia Daily News editor Larry Platt said on the record that the meeting took place. “He wouldn’t go into details,” says Carr, “but those we already had.”
Carr then told Block in an email that Platt confirmed the meeting that Osberg said never took place.
“He said, ‘What time are you closing?’ I said 7:30, and so at 7:50 he sent me a 200-word statement from Osberg acknowledging that the meeting had taken place.”
Here is Osberg’s statement to the Times reporters, time-stamped 7:56 p.m.:
I made it very clear in this February 7 meeting, that I was not suggesting ever taking control of the editorial process, nor was I planning to change any reporting policies going forward. Any suggestions to the contrary of that position are categorically denied, as I stated to you during our interview this morning.
What I did tell the editors that attended this meeting is that I would like to be advised before any articles are published on the subject of Philadelphia Media Network’s possible sale, so that as Publisher, I would not be blind-sided by a story publicly, without receiving advance notice. In view of the sensitive subject matter of the sale, as Publisher, I would have the prerogative to make such a request and it would not be uncommon to receive such notification.
Carr called the desk — after his deadline — and told editors about the statement. They were able to add a sentence to the story.
“It made me angry,” says the reporter. “I don’t know if I’ve ever been through something like that before: No, it didn’t happen; no, it didn’t happen; no, it didn’t happen; and then, yes it did.”
“I was angry.”
Source of David Carr Gibberish.
http://jimromenesko.com/2012/02/16/you-shouldnt-lie-to-david-carr-and-nyt/
David Carr was angry? Who gives a Shit?
I show 3 years of possible corruption and David Carr is so blind to the real story that he does not investigate any part of it and instead discriminates against a female blogger whom was exposing corruption in the US bankruptcy courts. David Carr has no right to say I am angry, and all the other cock and bull David Carr is blathering as news. I am the One who should be angry and so should the other victims of David Carr's Lies. As he has ruined lives with no remorse and acts angry over this, what a crock. David Carr does NOT investigate a story and David Carr listens to the yammer of sources such as liar Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group and his attorney David Aman of Tonkon Torp BOTH of whom were involved in the Summit Bankruptcy Scandal. Which David Carr did not even bother to look into.
David Carr, "heard “persistent reports” What? that sure sounds full of shit, I gave David Carr leads to documented proof on my story. David Carr of the New York Times Sure seems to believe the scuddle, the persistent voices of non-authority over documented proof. David Carr of the New York Times is an idiot at best.
David Carr Bullshit Regarding the Greg Osberg Scandal
"“I got in touch with [PMN spokesman] Mark Block on Tuesday,” Carr says in a phone interview. “He was spinning some, but he was helpful and direct" Says the Article above, what a Crock this is .. David Carr spins and spins and turns victims into criminals with out ANY reading of documented facts. David Carr is so full of shit, I was "helpful and direct" and honest, and David Carr of the New York Times Flat out Lied about me. David Carr is a classic case of you can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink. As David Carr is shown proof, documentation and still goes with the LIE over the Documented Evidence.
"By Wednesday morning, Chozick and Carr had multiple sources confirming Osberg’s meeting with editors, and the two knew they were going to use it in their story.." Again what a bunch of bullshit, multiple "sources", I gave David Carr leads to documented proof and David Carr uses the blathering of alleged facts from the mouths of supposed "multiple sources" to ruin this guys reputation, and in the name of what? protecting whom?
The article goes on to say "I said, ‘You know this is going to be in the newspaper, so I’m going to give you one freebie. I’m going to give you a chance to amend that answer.’”", I say what a Fuck Head David Carr is, one chance to amend your answer, then he will ruin your life with no proof. David Carr is a lying asshole, with agendas that are NOT of the Public Interest. Do not ever TRUST getting your news from the LIES of David Carr.
*"Carr says: “I asked Amy afterwards, ‘Do you think he choked? Why did he do that?’ We really couldn’t figure it out because word of that meeting was all over the building.”"
Gossip and Blather, that's news to the Lying alleged "Journalist" David Carr of the New York Times, office clatter is NEWS to ex druggies like David Carr who cannot read documented proof. David Carr relies on gossip and word of mouth for his story, and David Carr refuses to READ and investigate FACTS.
Documentation, Depositions, Videos, Contracts, Tax Information, and more were available regarding the Truth about Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group, but instead of looking into the story David Carr of the New York Times simply trashed me, lied about me and though word, documented word was all over the WORLD regarding Kevin Padrick, David Carr simply took his side over Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox and chose to defame her, me, without investigating easy to read documented proof.
David Carr flat out LIED saying that there was no one else who had issue with Obsidian Finance Group or Kevin Padrick and that seems to be protected by Law. I expose real corruption and tell the TRUTH and am not protected by Law as media, but David Carr of the New York Times, flat out lies, KNOWINGLY about me, Crystal Cox Blogger and there is no protection for me, as the Law protects the LIES of David Carr. Gee.. um I snorted to much cocaine and really believed my source.. your honor.. wa la no accountability for Dipshit David Carr to ruin lives, careers and run amok.
Let's See one of the worlds biggest Law Firms, a Billion Dollar Solar and Finance company sues a penniless blogger and Dumb Ass David Carr does not look into the Financial Companies and Lawyers but instead lets my clients, family, friends and the world believe I am an extortionist, that I attacked an innocent many with the power of my blogs and David Carr lied flat out claiming he looked into it and there was no other issues with this man, Kevin Padrick. All flat out lies, meanwhile EVIL David Carr is using the power of his voice at the New York Times to to ruin lives, families, careers, quality of life, credibility and without really reading documents or studying anything but simply listening the yammer across is phone heard through the woman hating, prejudices, discriminated, biased ears of New York Times Ignorant Reporter David Carr.
See David Carr took the Word Of Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group. David Carr interviewed me himself and did not print my side. This article talks of several sources that told David Carr of a secret meeting? Does Dave Carr of the NYT's have to name all these sources? See I had 3 years of documented sources, depositions, videos, court cases, videos of Kevin Padrick at meetings, news articles, tax documents, contracts and more and David Carr of the New York Times took this Evidence and told his readers that there was no reason for what I wrote about Kevin Padrick. David Carr defamed me, on purpose, after talking to me. With 3 years of documented sources, depositions, videos, court cases, videos of Kevin Padrick at meetings, news articles, tax documents, contracts available online, David Carr flat out lied to protect Kevin Padrick by saying the Truth Wins, and saying there was no one else with issue with Kevin Padrick when you can easily read that there is plenty of documentation to prove that my story had 3 years worth of merit.
DO not Trust David Carr of the New York Times and his Secret Sources, as David Carr Flat Out Lies to protect criminals and has no investigative skills.
David Carr of the New York Times talked about my writings on my home town of Lincoln County Montana, and my Montana corruption writings and instead of looking into a massive wall of corruption in Montana that involves the top politicians and drug companies in the world, David Carr simply slammed an investigative blogger reporting on the story.
David Carr trash talks my writings exposing Proskauer Rose Law Firm and Ex Supreme Court Judge Judith Kaye yet David Carr does not look into massive amounts of documented proof.
David Carr trash talks my stories of Time Warner CEO Jeffrey Bewkes and of CEO of Intel Paul Otellini yet David Car refuses to investigated the documented proof.
I have not dug into the Greg Osberg story as I am swamped right now. However, I am betting that David Carr is the Asshole in this one. Seems like a petty story, that is regarding the career of David Carr and personal issues to me. Yet David Carr ignores a story such as the many I write on that affect the public at large in a very real way.
Do you have a tip on the David Carr smackdown of Greg Osberg? What is the Truth about Greg Osberg, my guess is the Truth is the Exact opposite of what lying asshole David Carr suggest. As I personally told David Carr the TRUTH in my case and David Carr lied to the world about me, Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox. David Carr of the New York Times used his power, not for the good to investigate corruption in the New York Courts that I Blog about, not write on the SEC Corruption I post on, not to investigate the massively corrupt Proskauer Rose Law Firm or the whitewashing in the New York Justice System, not to Investigate the iViewit Stolen Technology, nor to look into the real story of Lightsquared, Philip Falcone and those who set him up to keep Clearwire and Verizon in Business.
See David Carr of the New York Times is a Spineless, Ball-Less Ex Cocaine Head, who cannot think for himself and instead let's big money tell him what to say. David Carr of the New York Times does not have the authority to speak the Truth, for David Carr of the New York Times is a whipping boy for big media and to protect the wall of corruption that big media like the New York Time protects.
I, Crystal Cox Blogger am TRULY independent, I get tips daily because I am very good at search engine placement. I read documents and investigate stories in a way that Spineless, Asshole David Carr of the New York Times simply cannot because he has a BOSS, he has Ad Dollars, Politics and Big Media to Answer to and I answer to NO One.
Expose the Lying, Life Ruining Weasel David Carr - Email me all the DIRT, documents, videos and indescresions. As David Carr of the New York Times, thinks it prudent to lie about me, defame me and make me look like a criminal when really I am the voice for the victims of big corporations, bankruptcy courts, corrupt judge and lawyers and I am the REAL Independent, NOT bought and Paid for Media that tells more of the truth than David Carr dare to.
David Carr of the New York Times is weak and rely's on bad information and his own Ego to write his stories and posts no proof of documents or "Reality". Do NOT ever Trust a Story from Dave Carr - David Carr of the New York Times.
Dipshit David Carr lied about the WRONG Investigative Blogger. And now the Obsidian V. Cox LIES and blathers of David Carr of the New York Times will be his Online Legacy.
David Carr of the New York Times answers to Big Media and David Carr of the New York Times does not tell you the truth, the whole TRUTH and Nothing But. David Carr of the New York Times uses his power to ruin lives instead of truly investigate stories and make the world a better place for the greater good. David Carr of the New York Times lies about me, defamed me, trash talked me and FAILED to investigate the document proof of my 3 year old story. I will EXPOSE every indiscrestion of David Carr of the New York Times, every late night romp, every video and document I receive, every secret that David Carr of the New York Times wants to hide, I will make sure that this information is found in the search engines.
Got a David Carr of the New York Times story, video, or any information .. DIRT on David Carr of the New York Times ? Email it to Me, I am Blogger Crystal Cox and I will EXPOSE David Carr no matter what, even if the Liars, Thugs and Thieves murder me, I still have bloggers in place to take over where I leave off and EXPOSE every dirty trick, dirty deed, perverted thought, illegal action, and well pretty much EVERY Single Thing regarding David Carr of the New York Times.
Defame Me, Lie About Me, Discredit me to my family, friends, and the world and the truth is I give voice to victims, expose whitewashing for elite law firms, expose bankruptcy courts, expose judges and those who create victims and David Carr of the New York Times sides with the wall of corruption and without investigative any documents of evidence.
Research links on documented Proof of Corruption involving Intel Corp., Proskauer Rose Law Firm, Foley and Lardner Law Firm including Michael Grebe, USPTO Corruption, New York Court Corruption, Warner Bros. Corruption, Lockheed Martin Corruption, CEO Jeffrey Bewkes, CEO Paul Otellini, MPEG LA and more tech companies, media companies, and law firms as well as US courts in the stealing of a 13 Trillion Dollar Technology ~ the iViewit Technology.
David Carr of the New York Times cannot read and his brain was gone long ago with all the Cocaine he snorted, so you will have to research the stories yourself, instead of simply believing me bad, wrong, defaming or in some way harming the innocent. Think for Yourself and DO NOT believe David Carr of the New York Times.
Over 1200 documents of Proof and Dumb Ass David Carr of the New York Times simply states that Blogger Crystal Cox is defaming and there you have it, no research, no documents linked or proven just the word of a cocaine head, woman hating, blogger hating "alleged" journalist ...
Do your Homework.
http://www.deniedpatent.com/
http://iviewit.tv/
http://www.josephleccese.com/
http://www.jeffreybewkes.com/
http://www.alexisdevane.com/
http://www.paulotellini.info/
http://intelcorruption.blogspot.com/
http://www.douglaschey.com/
David Carr of the New York Times flat out lies to protect Elite Lawyers, New York Corruption, and Big Media. David Carr is part of the PROBLEM and not the SOLUTION in the Culture of Corruption.
Got a Dipshit David Carr Tip, Email your David Carr tip to investigative blogger Crystal L. Cox - Crystal@CrystalCox.com .
EXPOSE David Carr of the New York Times - I am Dedicated to exposing David Carr of the New York Times, please email me your tips regarding David Carr of the New York Times.
David Carr of the New York Times has made and ENEMY for Life, in Me, Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox, by not bothering to Investigate a story and ruining lives with total disregard for the facts of the matter, and with complete lack of accountability.
David Carr of the New York Times is an asshole, indeed and David Carr of the New York Times has the power to of big Corrupt Media behind him with total disregard for the public at large and bringing down the wall of corruption in the US court system that protects big corporations, elite lawyers and liars like Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group.
Do your Homework, Think For Yourself, Believe NO One.
READ, Study, find the TRUTH for yourself.
NEVER listen to David Carr of the New York Times.
NEVER listen to David Carr of the New York Times.
Friday, February 3, 2012
Philip Falcone, Harbinger Capital Partners, Response to Allegations of the Honorable Charles E. Grassley Regarding Lightsquared. Senator Grassley, Philip Falcone, Deere and Company, Verizon, ATT, Clearwire, Trimble Navigations, James Kirkland, GPS Industry Council.
Philip Falcone seems to be Fighting Back. Seems to me that Senator Grassley flat out lied about the events and issues surrounding Lightsquared. Read the Philip Falcone Lightsquared Letter from legal council regarding Senator Charles E. Grassley's accusation, which seem to be false, fabricated and completely biased to protect his buddies at John Deere, Verizon, ATT, Clearwire, and Lockhead Martin.
Philip Falcone Regarding Senator Charles Grassley Lies
Max Baucus, Senator Charles Grassley, Deere and Company, Trimble Navigations, James Kirkland, Verizon, Craig McCaw, Harbinger Capital, Philip Falcone, Grassley vs. Lightsquared, Lightsquared, Todd Ruelle,
Philip Falcone Regarding Senator Charles Grassley Lies
Max Baucus, Senator Charles Grassley, Deere and Company, Trimble Navigations, James Kirkland, Verizon, Craig McCaw, Harbinger Capital, Philip Falcone, Grassley vs. Lightsquared, Lightsquared, Todd Ruelle,
Philip Falcone. LIGHTSQUARED AND GPS – THE FACTS. The GPS Industry had a Decade to Upgrade and now they are STOPPING fair competition to save them MONEY. Senator Grassley NEEDS to Wake Up to the Facts.
"For the last decade, LightSquared has planned to deploy a terrestrial network, and worked with the GPS community to make sure its network would not interfere with GPS.
LIGHTSQUARED’S SERVICE HAS BEEN EXPECTED FOR ALMOST TEN YEARS
· In 2001, LightSquared proposed using satellite spectrum for a fully-capable ground network. In 2002, after discussions with the GPS industry representatives, LightSquared agreed to curtail any portion of its signal that crossed into GPS frequencies. This agreement imposed restrictions that were 1000 times stricter than what the FCC rules eventually required.
· In 2003, the FCC adopted initial rules allowing LightSquared’s ground network to operate near GPS. These rules were adopted after a full review by DoD, FAA and all other interested government agencies. As the FCC said recently, “extensive terrestrial operations have been anticipated in [LightSquared’s spectrum band] for at least 8 years.” FCC MSS Flexibility Order, ¶ 27 (Apr. 6, 2011).
THE GPS INDUSTRY UNDERSTOOD THE SCOPE OF LIGHTSQUARED’S NETWORK
· The 2003 rules allowed LightSquared to deploy over 10,000 base stations.
· In 2003, the U.S. GPS Industry Council (“USGIC”) stated that the restrictions of the 2002 agreement were necessary to protect GPS against “[t]he increased user density from potentially millions of MSS mobile terminals operating in ATC mode . . . [and] potentially tens of thousands of ATC wireless base stations.” Reply Comments of USGIC, IB Docket No. 01-185, at 2 (Sept. 4, 2003) (emphasis added).
· In 2004, the USGIC supported the LightSquared application for authority to operate a ground network under the 2003 rules, stating that the 2002 agreement was “intended to protect GPS receivers and at the same time allow [LightSquared] to maximize the utility of its ATC [ground network] service to its users.” Letter from USGIC to FCC (Mar. 24, 2004).
· In 2005, the FCC removed all limits on the number of base stations LightSquared could build and increased their permissible power to 1.6 kw, the level at which LightSquared now plans to operate. Again, this decision was reviewed by all interested government agencies and was not challenged by USGIC.
· Beginning in 2006 and continuing to 2010, LightSquared disclosed its intent to build a wireless network using tens of thousands of base stations in its annual filings with the SEC.
THE GPS INDUSTRY KNEW ABOUT LIGHTSQUARED’S PLANNED POWER LEVELS AND DID NOT OBJECT
· In 2009, LightSquared asked the FCC to increase the power levels of its base stations by approximately 10 times to 15 kw, to match the power levels at which other wireless networks are permitted to operate.
· USGIC did not object to even those higher power levels. It objected only to the possibility of interference into the GPS band from low-power indoor femtocells, an objection it withdrew in August 2009 after reaching agreement with LightSquared.
· In March 2010, the FCC approved LightSquared’s increased power levels. As with all previous FCC proceedings, the order was issued after a public proceeding and was fully coordinated with all interested federal government agencies. Neither GPSIC, nor any other party, filed for reconsideration or review of this order.
· Also in March 2010, the FCC required LightSquared to build a ground network reaching 260 million people by the end of 2015. Neither GPSIC, nor any other party, filed for reconsideration or review of this requirement.
LIGHTSQUARED IS DOING EVERYTHING IT CAN TO WORK WITH GPS TO ADDRESS ISSUES RAISED ONLY A FEW MONTHS AGO
· In September 2010, USGIC raised for the first time — in a general mobile satellite proceeding -- the possibility that some GPS receivers may be subject to interference because they can be overpowered by signals transmitted by LightSquared inside the spectrum the FCC licensed to Lightsquared.
· In November 2010, LightSquared applied to allow devices onto its ground network that do not also communicate with its satellite. This application did not change the power, number, deployment or any other technical characteristic of LightSquared’s base stations. USGIC raised the same objection it raised in September.
· Although the interference issue was irrelevant to this application, LightSquared, in January 2010, proposed a rigorous program of testing to determine the extent of the susceptibility of GPS receivers to LightSquared’s transmissions, which the FCC made a condition of granting LightSquared’s application on Jan. 26, 2011.
· The FCC validated the GPS testing process a few weeks ago by unanimous Commission vote, noting USGIC’s September 2010 comments and the cooperative testing program, and stating that “responsibility for protecting services rests not only on new entrants but also on incumbent users themselves, who must use receivers that reasonably discriminate against reception of signals outside their allocated spectrum.” FCC MSS Flexibility Order, ¶ 27 (Apr. 6, 2011).
Look Deep at what Senator Grassley is Up to, he is Connected to Monsanto, John Deere, and Verizon. Do your Homework.
LIGHTSQUARED’S SERVICE HAS BEEN EXPECTED FOR ALMOST TEN YEARS
· In 2001, LightSquared proposed using satellite spectrum for a fully-capable ground network. In 2002, after discussions with the GPS industry representatives, LightSquared agreed to curtail any portion of its signal that crossed into GPS frequencies. This agreement imposed restrictions that were 1000 times stricter than what the FCC rules eventually required.
· In 2003, the FCC adopted initial rules allowing LightSquared’s ground network to operate near GPS. These rules were adopted after a full review by DoD, FAA and all other interested government agencies. As the FCC said recently, “extensive terrestrial operations have been anticipated in [LightSquared’s spectrum band] for at least 8 years.” FCC MSS Flexibility Order, ¶ 27 (Apr. 6, 2011).
THE GPS INDUSTRY UNDERSTOOD THE SCOPE OF LIGHTSQUARED’S NETWORK
· The 2003 rules allowed LightSquared to deploy over 10,000 base stations.
· In 2003, the U.S. GPS Industry Council (“USGIC”) stated that the restrictions of the 2002 agreement were necessary to protect GPS against “[t]he increased user density from potentially millions of MSS mobile terminals operating in ATC mode . . . [and] potentially tens of thousands of ATC wireless base stations.” Reply Comments of USGIC, IB Docket No. 01-185, at 2 (Sept. 4, 2003) (emphasis added).
· In 2004, the USGIC supported the LightSquared application for authority to operate a ground network under the 2003 rules, stating that the 2002 agreement was “intended to protect GPS receivers and at the same time allow [LightSquared] to maximize the utility of its ATC [ground network] service to its users.” Letter from USGIC to FCC (Mar. 24, 2004).
· In 2005, the FCC removed all limits on the number of base stations LightSquared could build and increased their permissible power to 1.6 kw, the level at which LightSquared now plans to operate. Again, this decision was reviewed by all interested government agencies and was not challenged by USGIC.
· Beginning in 2006 and continuing to 2010, LightSquared disclosed its intent to build a wireless network using tens of thousands of base stations in its annual filings with the SEC.
THE GPS INDUSTRY KNEW ABOUT LIGHTSQUARED’S PLANNED POWER LEVELS AND DID NOT OBJECT
· In 2009, LightSquared asked the FCC to increase the power levels of its base stations by approximately 10 times to 15 kw, to match the power levels at which other wireless networks are permitted to operate.
· USGIC did not object to even those higher power levels. It objected only to the possibility of interference into the GPS band from low-power indoor femtocells, an objection it withdrew in August 2009 after reaching agreement with LightSquared.
· In March 2010, the FCC approved LightSquared’s increased power levels. As with all previous FCC proceedings, the order was issued after a public proceeding and was fully coordinated with all interested federal government agencies. Neither GPSIC, nor any other party, filed for reconsideration or review of this order.
· Also in March 2010, the FCC required LightSquared to build a ground network reaching 260 million people by the end of 2015. Neither GPSIC, nor any other party, filed for reconsideration or review of this requirement.
LIGHTSQUARED IS DOING EVERYTHING IT CAN TO WORK WITH GPS TO ADDRESS ISSUES RAISED ONLY A FEW MONTHS AGO
· In September 2010, USGIC raised for the first time — in a general mobile satellite proceeding -- the possibility that some GPS receivers may be subject to interference because they can be overpowered by signals transmitted by LightSquared inside the spectrum the FCC licensed to Lightsquared.
· In November 2010, LightSquared applied to allow devices onto its ground network that do not also communicate with its satellite. This application did not change the power, number, deployment or any other technical characteristic of LightSquared’s base stations. USGIC raised the same objection it raised in September.
· Although the interference issue was irrelevant to this application, LightSquared, in January 2010, proposed a rigorous program of testing to determine the extent of the susceptibility of GPS receivers to LightSquared’s transmissions, which the FCC made a condition of granting LightSquared’s application on Jan. 26, 2011.
· The FCC validated the GPS testing process a few weeks ago by unanimous Commission vote, noting USGIC’s September 2010 comments and the cooperative testing program, and stating that “responsibility for protecting services rests not only on new entrants but also on incumbent users themselves, who must use receivers that reasonably discriminate against reception of signals outside their allocated spectrum.” FCC MSS Flexibility Order, ¶ 27 (Apr. 6, 2011).
Look Deep at what Senator Grassley is Up to, he is Connected to Monsanto, John Deere, and Verizon. Do your Homework.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)