STOP Verizon and ATT from Controlling ALL Spectrum
Showing posts with label MSS Spectrum. Show all posts
Showing posts with label MSS Spectrum. Show all posts
Monday, March 26, 2012
Friday, February 3, 2012
Philip Falcone. LIGHTSQUARED AND GPS – THE FACTS. The GPS Industry had a Decade to Upgrade and now they are STOPPING fair competition to save them MONEY. Senator Grassley NEEDS to Wake Up to the Facts.
"For the last decade, LightSquared has planned to deploy a terrestrial network, and worked with the GPS community to make sure its network would not interfere with GPS.
LIGHTSQUARED’S SERVICE HAS BEEN EXPECTED FOR ALMOST TEN YEARS
· In 2001, LightSquared proposed using satellite spectrum for a fully-capable ground network. In 2002, after discussions with the GPS industry representatives, LightSquared agreed to curtail any portion of its signal that crossed into GPS frequencies. This agreement imposed restrictions that were 1000 times stricter than what the FCC rules eventually required.
· In 2003, the FCC adopted initial rules allowing LightSquared’s ground network to operate near GPS. These rules were adopted after a full review by DoD, FAA and all other interested government agencies. As the FCC said recently, “extensive terrestrial operations have been anticipated in [LightSquared’s spectrum band] for at least 8 years.” FCC MSS Flexibility Order, ¶ 27 (Apr. 6, 2011).
THE GPS INDUSTRY UNDERSTOOD THE SCOPE OF LIGHTSQUARED’S NETWORK
· The 2003 rules allowed LightSquared to deploy over 10,000 base stations.
· In 2003, the U.S. GPS Industry Council (“USGIC”) stated that the restrictions of the 2002 agreement were necessary to protect GPS against “[t]he increased user density from potentially millions of MSS mobile terminals operating in ATC mode . . . [and] potentially tens of thousands of ATC wireless base stations.” Reply Comments of USGIC, IB Docket No. 01-185, at 2 (Sept. 4, 2003) (emphasis added).
· In 2004, the USGIC supported the LightSquared application for authority to operate a ground network under the 2003 rules, stating that the 2002 agreement was “intended to protect GPS receivers and at the same time allow [LightSquared] to maximize the utility of its ATC [ground network] service to its users.” Letter from USGIC to FCC (Mar. 24, 2004).
· In 2005, the FCC removed all limits on the number of base stations LightSquared could build and increased their permissible power to 1.6 kw, the level at which LightSquared now plans to operate. Again, this decision was reviewed by all interested government agencies and was not challenged by USGIC.
· Beginning in 2006 and continuing to 2010, LightSquared disclosed its intent to build a wireless network using tens of thousands of base stations in its annual filings with the SEC.
THE GPS INDUSTRY KNEW ABOUT LIGHTSQUARED’S PLANNED POWER LEVELS AND DID NOT OBJECT
· In 2009, LightSquared asked the FCC to increase the power levels of its base stations by approximately 10 times to 15 kw, to match the power levels at which other wireless networks are permitted to operate.
· USGIC did not object to even those higher power levels. It objected only to the possibility of interference into the GPS band from low-power indoor femtocells, an objection it withdrew in August 2009 after reaching agreement with LightSquared.
· In March 2010, the FCC approved LightSquared’s increased power levels. As with all previous FCC proceedings, the order was issued after a public proceeding and was fully coordinated with all interested federal government agencies. Neither GPSIC, nor any other party, filed for reconsideration or review of this order.
· Also in March 2010, the FCC required LightSquared to build a ground network reaching 260 million people by the end of 2015. Neither GPSIC, nor any other party, filed for reconsideration or review of this requirement.
LIGHTSQUARED IS DOING EVERYTHING IT CAN TO WORK WITH GPS TO ADDRESS ISSUES RAISED ONLY A FEW MONTHS AGO
· In September 2010, USGIC raised for the first time — in a general mobile satellite proceeding -- the possibility that some GPS receivers may be subject to interference because they can be overpowered by signals transmitted by LightSquared inside the spectrum the FCC licensed to Lightsquared.
· In November 2010, LightSquared applied to allow devices onto its ground network that do not also communicate with its satellite. This application did not change the power, number, deployment or any other technical characteristic of LightSquared’s base stations. USGIC raised the same objection it raised in September.
· Although the interference issue was irrelevant to this application, LightSquared, in January 2010, proposed a rigorous program of testing to determine the extent of the susceptibility of GPS receivers to LightSquared’s transmissions, which the FCC made a condition of granting LightSquared’s application on Jan. 26, 2011.
· The FCC validated the GPS testing process a few weeks ago by unanimous Commission vote, noting USGIC’s September 2010 comments and the cooperative testing program, and stating that “responsibility for protecting services rests not only on new entrants but also on incumbent users themselves, who must use receivers that reasonably discriminate against reception of signals outside their allocated spectrum.” FCC MSS Flexibility Order, ¶ 27 (Apr. 6, 2011).
Look Deep at what Senator Grassley is Up to, he is Connected to Monsanto, John Deere, and Verizon. Do your Homework.
LIGHTSQUARED’S SERVICE HAS BEEN EXPECTED FOR ALMOST TEN YEARS
· In 2001, LightSquared proposed using satellite spectrum for a fully-capable ground network. In 2002, after discussions with the GPS industry representatives, LightSquared agreed to curtail any portion of its signal that crossed into GPS frequencies. This agreement imposed restrictions that were 1000 times stricter than what the FCC rules eventually required.
· In 2003, the FCC adopted initial rules allowing LightSquared’s ground network to operate near GPS. These rules were adopted after a full review by DoD, FAA and all other interested government agencies. As the FCC said recently, “extensive terrestrial operations have been anticipated in [LightSquared’s spectrum band] for at least 8 years.” FCC MSS Flexibility Order, ¶ 27 (Apr. 6, 2011).
THE GPS INDUSTRY UNDERSTOOD THE SCOPE OF LIGHTSQUARED’S NETWORK
· The 2003 rules allowed LightSquared to deploy over 10,000 base stations.
· In 2003, the U.S. GPS Industry Council (“USGIC”) stated that the restrictions of the 2002 agreement were necessary to protect GPS against “[t]he increased user density from potentially millions of MSS mobile terminals operating in ATC mode . . . [and] potentially tens of thousands of ATC wireless base stations.” Reply Comments of USGIC, IB Docket No. 01-185, at 2 (Sept. 4, 2003) (emphasis added).
· In 2004, the USGIC supported the LightSquared application for authority to operate a ground network under the 2003 rules, stating that the 2002 agreement was “intended to protect GPS receivers and at the same time allow [LightSquared] to maximize the utility of its ATC [ground network] service to its users.” Letter from USGIC to FCC (Mar. 24, 2004).
· In 2005, the FCC removed all limits on the number of base stations LightSquared could build and increased their permissible power to 1.6 kw, the level at which LightSquared now plans to operate. Again, this decision was reviewed by all interested government agencies and was not challenged by USGIC.
· Beginning in 2006 and continuing to 2010, LightSquared disclosed its intent to build a wireless network using tens of thousands of base stations in its annual filings with the SEC.
THE GPS INDUSTRY KNEW ABOUT LIGHTSQUARED’S PLANNED POWER LEVELS AND DID NOT OBJECT
· In 2009, LightSquared asked the FCC to increase the power levels of its base stations by approximately 10 times to 15 kw, to match the power levels at which other wireless networks are permitted to operate.
· USGIC did not object to even those higher power levels. It objected only to the possibility of interference into the GPS band from low-power indoor femtocells, an objection it withdrew in August 2009 after reaching agreement with LightSquared.
· In March 2010, the FCC approved LightSquared’s increased power levels. As with all previous FCC proceedings, the order was issued after a public proceeding and was fully coordinated with all interested federal government agencies. Neither GPSIC, nor any other party, filed for reconsideration or review of this order.
· Also in March 2010, the FCC required LightSquared to build a ground network reaching 260 million people by the end of 2015. Neither GPSIC, nor any other party, filed for reconsideration or review of this requirement.
LIGHTSQUARED IS DOING EVERYTHING IT CAN TO WORK WITH GPS TO ADDRESS ISSUES RAISED ONLY A FEW MONTHS AGO
· In September 2010, USGIC raised for the first time — in a general mobile satellite proceeding -- the possibility that some GPS receivers may be subject to interference because they can be overpowered by signals transmitted by LightSquared inside the spectrum the FCC licensed to Lightsquared.
· In November 2010, LightSquared applied to allow devices onto its ground network that do not also communicate with its satellite. This application did not change the power, number, deployment or any other technical characteristic of LightSquared’s base stations. USGIC raised the same objection it raised in September.
· Although the interference issue was irrelevant to this application, LightSquared, in January 2010, proposed a rigorous program of testing to determine the extent of the susceptibility of GPS receivers to LightSquared’s transmissions, which the FCC made a condition of granting LightSquared’s application on Jan. 26, 2011.
· The FCC validated the GPS testing process a few weeks ago by unanimous Commission vote, noting USGIC’s September 2010 comments and the cooperative testing program, and stating that “responsibility for protecting services rests not only on new entrants but also on incumbent users themselves, who must use receivers that reasonably discriminate against reception of signals outside their allocated spectrum.” FCC MSS Flexibility Order, ¶ 27 (Apr. 6, 2011).
Look Deep at what Senator Grassley is Up to, he is Connected to Monsanto, John Deere, and Verizon. Do your Homework.
Wednesday, March 2, 2011
TerreStar Bankruptcy Information - Timeline of S-Band Mobile Satellite Services (MSS)
"Timeline of S-Band Mobile Satellite Services (MSS)
1992: Following initial indications that demand would increase in L-band, the World
Radiocommunication Conference (WRC-92) takes preliminary steps to allocate MSS spectrum
in the S-band.
1995: MSS allocation in S-band is formally approved at WRC-95.
1997: The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) reallocates 70 MHz (2 x 35 of spectrum to MSS at 1990-2025 MHz and 2165-2000 MHz, providing for relocation of broadcast auxiliary and fixed service incumbents by MSS entrants.
Nine MSS applicants apply to provide S-band service to the U.S.
2000: FCC adopts service rules governing the S-band and decides that the S-band spectrum will be distributed pro rata among interested applicants.
FCC expressly anticipates that some licensees may not actually build systems and that the
spectrum they surrender could be redistributed to the remaining providers.
2001: S-band MSS authorizations are granted to eight entities; each licensee receives an initial 2 x 3.5 MHz assignment.
FCC opens rulemaking to consider permitting MSS licensees to offer ancillary terrestrial
component (ATC) service via reuse of satellite spectrum.
2003: Following cancellation of three MSS licenses, FCC reassigns some S-band spectrum to terrestrial wireless services but leaves 2 x 20 MHz for MSS.
Spectrum assignments of remaining S-band providers are increased to 2 x 4 MHz.
Over objections of wireless carriers, FCC adopts rules authorizing MSS licensees to offer ATC
upon meeting certain satellite service prerequisites. FCC explains that the terrestrial component
will:
• Enhance public safety
• Ensure spectrum efficiency
• Improve MSS coverage in urban canyons where satellite signal is blocked
• Strengthen competition in MSS markets
2004: MSV (L-band) is granted first ever authorization to provide ATC.
2005: FCC adopts reconsideration order affirming right of MSS licensees to offer ATCservice.
Verizon Wireless voluntarily drops its court appeal of the FCC’s 2003 ATC decision.
Additional MSS carriers announce that they will apply for ATC authorization.
Following additional license surrenders, two strong competitors for S-band spectrum emerge:
TMI/TerreStar and ICO.
• Each S-band carrier certifies continued milestone compliance
• FCC proposes to redistribute at least some, and perhaps all, of available S-band
spectrum to TMI/TerreStar and ICO; each provider could obtain up to 2 x 10 MHz
• TMI/TerreStar publicly announces its intent to apply for ATC authorization at the
earliest possible date
FCC allocates “2 x 10” spectrum capacity to TMI/TerreStar and ICO, allowing for the
development of robust MSS/ATC services across North America. "
1992: Following initial indications that demand would increase in L-band, the World
Radiocommunication Conference (WRC-92) takes preliminary steps to allocate MSS spectrum
in the S-band.
1995: MSS allocation in S-band is formally approved at WRC-95.
1997: The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) reallocates 70 MHz (2 x 35 of spectrum to MSS at 1990-2025 MHz and 2165-2000 MHz, providing for relocation of broadcast auxiliary and fixed service incumbents by MSS entrants.
Nine MSS applicants apply to provide S-band service to the U.S.
2000: FCC adopts service rules governing the S-band and decides that the S-band spectrum will be distributed pro rata among interested applicants.
FCC expressly anticipates that some licensees may not actually build systems and that the
spectrum they surrender could be redistributed to the remaining providers.
2001: S-band MSS authorizations are granted to eight entities; each licensee receives an initial 2 x 3.5 MHz assignment.
FCC opens rulemaking to consider permitting MSS licensees to offer ancillary terrestrial
component (ATC) service via reuse of satellite spectrum.
2003: Following cancellation of three MSS licenses, FCC reassigns some S-band spectrum to terrestrial wireless services but leaves 2 x 20 MHz for MSS.
Spectrum assignments of remaining S-band providers are increased to 2 x 4 MHz.
Over objections of wireless carriers, FCC adopts rules authorizing MSS licensees to offer ATC
upon meeting certain satellite service prerequisites. FCC explains that the terrestrial component
will:
• Enhance public safety
• Ensure spectrum efficiency
• Improve MSS coverage in urban canyons where satellite signal is blocked
Reduce costs of providing MSS
• Strengthen competition in MSS markets
2004: MSV (L-band) is granted first ever authorization to provide ATC.
2005: FCC adopts reconsideration order affirming right of MSS licensees to offer ATCservice.
Verizon Wireless voluntarily drops its court appeal of the FCC’s 2003 ATC decision.
Additional MSS carriers announce that they will apply for ATC authorization.
Following additional license surrenders, two strong competitors for S-band spectrum emerge:
TMI/TerreStar and ICO.
• Each S-band carrier certifies continued milestone compliance
• FCC proposes to redistribute at least some, and perhaps all, of available S-band
spectrum to TMI/TerreStar and ICO; each provider could obtain up to 2 x 10 MHz
• TMI/TerreStar publicly announces its intent to apply for ATC authorization at the
earliest possible date
FCC allocates “2 x 10” spectrum capacity to TMI/TerreStar and ICO, allowing for the
development of robust MSS/ATC services across North America. "
Source of Post
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/72573044/TerreStar-Timeline
http://www.sanjivahuja.com/search/label/TerreStar%20Corp.%20Bankruptcy
http://www.investigativeblogger.com/search/label/TerreStar%20Corp.%20Bankruptcy
Posted Here by
More on the TerreStar Bankruptcy
http://www.sanjivahuja.com/search/label/TerreStar%20Corp.%20Bankruptcy
http://www.investigativeblogger.com/search/label/TerreStar%20Corp.%20Bankruptcy
Posted Here by
Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Wednesday, February 23, 2011
MSS Spectrum News Archives - Moves by Clearwire and FCC oversight could make Harbinger's spectrum gamble look like a very bad bet.
November 9th 2010
"When Barack Obama’s National Broadband Plan was published in March, wireless broadband spectrum was identified as crucial in helping the US to realise its broadband goals. A chunk of this spectrum had been reserved for mobile satellite services (MSS).
Yet due to the expense of creating a hybrid satellite and terrestrial network, it had remained largely unused.
Even so, because the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) had provided this Spectrum Free of Charge, many observers believed it would be extremely valuable if conditions regarding its use for terrestrial services were eventually relaxed. Chief among them was Philip Falcone and Harbinger, his New York hedge fund.
Harbinger's bullishness was apparent when it bought SkyTerra, a struggling MSS operator, in the same month Mr Obama revealed his broadband plan. SkyTerra had reported a net loss of US$64m on revenues of just US$8m in the final quarter of 2009.
Yet Harbinger had realised the Spectrum SkyTerra owned would have considerable value if the FCC allowed it to be used for a so-called ancillary terrestrial component (ATC).
Eager to put the MSS Spectrum to effective use on the ground, and help move the National Broadband Plan forwards, the FCC altered regulations regarding its usage to suit Harbinger's needs at the same time it approved the hedge fund's takeover of SkyTerra for just US$263m.
Following the acquisition, Harbinger launched a new business called LightSquared – aimed at becoming a national wireless broadband network operating an exclusively wholesale business and expected to cost US$7bn to build.
Soon afterwards, Mr Falcone was suggesting that SkyTerra's spectrum could be worth as much as US$3–5bn. His lofty valuation was based on the expectation that a similar but smaller chunk of spectrum held by Terrestar – another satellite company 30% owned by Harbinger – could be valued at between US$1.5bn and US$2bn, even if Terrestar went bankrupt (always a possibility given the FCC's stringent conditions that spectrum must be used or rescinded).
Last month, it did just that, only weeks after launching its first commercial dual-mode handset (working on both satellite and terrestrial networks) through mobile-phone operator AT&T. With the value of Terrestar's Spectrum set to become the subject of intense scrutiny in the coming months, Mr Falcone's bold assertions could be put to the test.
LightSquared's many challenges
Perhaps the biggest challenge to Mr Falcone's business case comes from Clearwire.
Majority owned by US operator Sprint Nextel, Clearwire already operates its own wireless broadband network and is shopping its wholesale capacity to potential retail partners (it recently scored a deal with Best Buy, the world's largest electronics retailer).
LightSquared is not only playing catch-up from a network perspective but is also targeting many of the same potential customers. T-Mobile is a case in point.
The fourth-largest mobile-phone operator in the US, it is the sort of customer LightSquared craves.
What's more, because Sprint Nextel holds equity in Clearwire, and the FCC has ruled that neither AT&T nor Verizon can lease more than 25% of LightSquared's network, T-Mobile is the only one of the four major mobile-phone operators that could become a key anchor tenant for LightSquared.
Yet T-Mobile has reportedly been in talks with Clearwire about a partnership.
Perhaps more worrying for Mr Falcone is Clearwire's current spectrum sale, expected to be completed by the end of this month.
If it is true that Mr Falcone really wants to profit from the perceived value of LightSquared's spectrum (before ever having to run a real network), then Clearwire could deliver a huge blow to his spectrum arbitrage exit strategy by delivering the wrong kind of valuation benchmark.
While the FCC appears to have been on LightSquared’s side so far, its recent moves may also cause jitters at Harbinger.
In September, a company called Open Range, which relies on ATC spectrum owned by MSS operator Globalstar to operate its rural terrestrial wireless network, was denied a request to delay meeting ATC satellite criteria for a further 16 months.
Open Range has effectively been left in limbo by the decision and must now find other spectrum to offer its services.
Given the FCC's strict rollout targets for LightSquared's terrestrial and satellite services, the ruling against Open Range issues a stern warning to the Harbinger-backed company.
Although LightSquared has been busy in recent months, announcing a US$7bn network agreement with Nokia Siemens Networks, a chipset deal with Qualcomm and around US$2bn in debt and equity commitments, numerous developments could upset the business. Partnership with Clearwire could knock T-Mobile out of LightSquared's equation, while the outcome of Clearwire's Spectrum Sale could also make LightSquared look like a very bad hedge by Mr Falcone.
And deprived of a quick exit strategy, LightSquared could find the cost of actually building a hybrid satellite and terrestrial network to the FCC’s tight rollout targets proves too much. Particularly if all the big retail partners are gone."
Source of Nokia Siemens Networks, LightSquared, Clearwire Corp., Philip Falcone, Craig McCaw, Qualcomm, Open Range Post
"When Barack Obama’s National Broadband Plan was published in March, wireless broadband spectrum was identified as crucial in helping the US to realise its broadband goals. A chunk of this spectrum had been reserved for mobile satellite services (MSS).
Yet due to the expense of creating a hybrid satellite and terrestrial network, it had remained largely unused.
Even so, because the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) had provided this Spectrum Free of Charge, many observers believed it would be extremely valuable if conditions regarding its use for terrestrial services were eventually relaxed. Chief among them was Philip Falcone and Harbinger, his New York hedge fund.
Harbinger's bullishness was apparent when it bought SkyTerra, a struggling MSS operator, in the same month Mr Obama revealed his broadband plan. SkyTerra had reported a net loss of US$64m on revenues of just US$8m in the final quarter of 2009.
Yet Harbinger had realised the Spectrum SkyTerra owned would have considerable value if the FCC allowed it to be used for a so-called ancillary terrestrial component (ATC).
Eager to put the MSS Spectrum to effective use on the ground, and help move the National Broadband Plan forwards, the FCC altered regulations regarding its usage to suit Harbinger's needs at the same time it approved the hedge fund's takeover of SkyTerra for just US$263m.
Following the acquisition, Harbinger launched a new business called LightSquared – aimed at becoming a national wireless broadband network operating an exclusively wholesale business and expected to cost US$7bn to build.
Soon afterwards, Mr Falcone was suggesting that SkyTerra's spectrum could be worth as much as US$3–5bn. His lofty valuation was based on the expectation that a similar but smaller chunk of spectrum held by Terrestar – another satellite company 30% owned by Harbinger – could be valued at between US$1.5bn and US$2bn, even if Terrestar went bankrupt (always a possibility given the FCC's stringent conditions that spectrum must be used or rescinded).
Last month, it did just that, only weeks after launching its first commercial dual-mode handset (working on both satellite and terrestrial networks) through mobile-phone operator AT&T. With the value of Terrestar's Spectrum set to become the subject of intense scrutiny in the coming months, Mr Falcone's bold assertions could be put to the test.
LightSquared's many challenges
Perhaps the biggest challenge to Mr Falcone's business case comes from Clearwire.
Majority owned by US operator Sprint Nextel, Clearwire already operates its own wireless broadband network and is shopping its wholesale capacity to potential retail partners (it recently scored a deal with Best Buy, the world's largest electronics retailer).
LightSquared is not only playing catch-up from a network perspective but is also targeting many of the same potential customers. T-Mobile is a case in point.
The fourth-largest mobile-phone operator in the US, it is the sort of customer LightSquared craves.
What's more, because Sprint Nextel holds equity in Clearwire, and the FCC has ruled that neither AT&T nor Verizon can lease more than 25% of LightSquared's network, T-Mobile is the only one of the four major mobile-phone operators that could become a key anchor tenant for LightSquared.
Yet T-Mobile has reportedly been in talks with Clearwire about a partnership.
Perhaps more worrying for Mr Falcone is Clearwire's current spectrum sale, expected to be completed by the end of this month.
If it is true that Mr Falcone really wants to profit from the perceived value of LightSquared's spectrum (before ever having to run a real network), then Clearwire could deliver a huge blow to his spectrum arbitrage exit strategy by delivering the wrong kind of valuation benchmark.
While the FCC appears to have been on LightSquared’s side so far, its recent moves may also cause jitters at Harbinger.
In September, a company called Open Range, which relies on ATC spectrum owned by MSS operator Globalstar to operate its rural terrestrial wireless network, was denied a request to delay meeting ATC satellite criteria for a further 16 months.
Open Range has effectively been left in limbo by the decision and must now find other spectrum to offer its services.
Given the FCC's strict rollout targets for LightSquared's terrestrial and satellite services, the ruling against Open Range issues a stern warning to the Harbinger-backed company.
Although LightSquared has been busy in recent months, announcing a US$7bn network agreement with Nokia Siemens Networks, a chipset deal with Qualcomm and around US$2bn in debt and equity commitments, numerous developments could upset the business. Partnership with Clearwire could knock T-Mobile out of LightSquared's equation, while the outcome of Clearwire's Spectrum Sale could also make LightSquared look like a very bad hedge by Mr Falcone.
And deprived of a quick exit strategy, LightSquared could find the cost of actually building a hybrid satellite and terrestrial network to the FCC’s tight rollout targets proves too much. Particularly if all the big retail partners are gone."
Source of Nokia Siemens Networks, LightSquared, Clearwire Corp., Philip Falcone, Craig McCaw, Qualcomm, Open Range Post
http://www.eiu.com/index.asp?layout=ib3Article&pubtypeid=1162462501&article_id=1517583136&rf=0
So Was the Spectrum Free from the FCC or Not?
Clearwire Corp., Craig McCaw did not REALLY Exit? It was more of a Strategic Move to Make him and Eagle River Investors More Money, for it Looks Like Craig McCaw had inside information, in my Opinion... as Isn't T-Mobile hooked up with Philip Falcone and Harbinger Capital and won't T-Mobile be one of the MSS Spectrum Retailers for LightSquared ? Look Deep, Very Deep...
Globalstar Comments on FCC Waiver for LightSquared's Use of MSS Spectrum for Terrestrial Broadband
"
FCC Waiver Permits LightSquared to Offer Single Mode Terrestrial Only Broadband Products and Services Using Mobile Satellite Spectrum | |
COVINGTON, La., Jan. 31, 2011 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Globalstar, Inc. (Nasdaq:GSAT), a leading provider of mobile satellite voice and data services to businesses, government, and individuals today announced the Company's response to the recent U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) decision to grant LightSquared Subsidiary LLC (LightSquared), a conditional waiver of the Integrated Service Rule. L. Barbee Ponder, General Counsel and VP of Regulatory Affairs, Globalstar, Inc. stated, "With this order LightSquared has been granted the authority to provide terrestrial only wireless broadband services using mobile satellite spectrum. This relaxation of the gating criteria for LightSquared is necessitated by the explosive growth of spectrum-hungry mobile broadband devices. We look forward to the FCC extending similar flexibility to other mobile satellite services providers including Globalstar. "We are also pleased with the FCC's continued recognition that the L-band portion of the mobile satellite spectrum is suitable for delivering mobile broadband to consumers and helping meet the Commission's significant spectrum objectives outlined in the National Broadband Plan." About Globalstar, Inc. For more information regarding Globalstar, please visit Globalstar's web site atwww.globalstar.com The Globalstar, Inc. logo is available at http://www.globenewswire.com/newsroom/prs/?pkgid=8183 CONTACT: For further media information: Globalstar, Inc. Dean Hirasawa (985) 335-1505 Dean.hirasawa@globalstar.com Skyya Communications Susan Donahue (646) 454-9378 Susan.donahue@skyya.com " Source https://globenewswire.com/newsroom/news.html?d=212259 | |
Wireless carriers want MSS Spectrum - May 2001 MSS Spectrum News Archives
"Wireless carriers want MSS spectrum
The Cellular Telecommunications & Internet Association filed a petition for rulemaking with the Federal Communications Commission asking the agency to stop granting spectrum to the mobile satellite services industry and reallocate existing MSS Spectrum “to more efficient users of spectrum.”
CTIA said the MSS Industry already is failing financially, and new MSS entrants are unlikely to make effective use of the spectrum in the 2 GHz band.
MSS Spectrum could be used to help alleviate the shortage of spectrum for other services, namely the Mobile Wireless.
CTIA and the mobile wireless industry have been prodding the government to release spectrum for spectrum-intensive third-generation services.
Spectrum the industry wants most is tied up in the Defense Department.
Other spectrum identified by the International Telecommunication Union is used by broadcasters and MMDS operators. The 2 GHz band may be the industry’s only chance for 3G Spectrum.
“The question is, will we have the concrete on which the new information superhighway rides?” said CTIA President and CEO Tom Wheeler during last week’s Wireless Agenda show. “I’m sad to say that it is an issue very much in doubt.
There is no single issue more important than whether or not there is sufficient spectrum for wireless data. It’s halftime, and we’re down a bunch.”
CTIA said the MSS Industry already is failing financially, and new MSS entrants are unlikely to make effective use of the spectrum in the 2 GHz band.
MSS Spectrum could be used to help alleviate the shortage of spectrum for other services, namely the Mobile Wireless.
CTIA and the mobile wireless industry have been prodding the government to release spectrum for spectrum-intensive third-generation services.
Spectrum the industry wants most is tied up in the Defense Department.
Other spectrum identified by the International Telecommunication Union is used by broadcasters and MMDS operators. The 2 GHz band may be the industry’s only chance for 3G Spectrum.
“The question is, will we have the concrete on which the new information superhighway rides?” said CTIA President and CEO Tom Wheeler during last week’s Wireless Agenda show. “I’m sad to say that it is an issue very much in doubt.
There is no single issue more important than whether or not there is sufficient spectrum for wireless data. It’s halftime, and we’re down a bunch.”
Source of MSS Spectrum Post
http://connectedplanetonline.com/news/telecom_wireless_carriers_mss/
http://connectedplanetonline.com/news/telecom_wireless_carriers_mss/
Ten Years Later - We Got Spectrum..
FCC Proposes to Remove Barriers to Terrestrial Use of MSS Spectrum
July 15, 2010
"FCC Proposes to Remove Barriers to Terrestrial Use of MSS Spectrum
R. Michael Senkowski, Peter D. Shields and Jennifer D. Hindin
Today the Federal Communications Commission (FCC or the Commission) released a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) and Notice of Inquiry (NOI) seeking to remove regulatory barriers to terrestrial use in 90 megahertz of spectrum allocated to the Mobile Satellite Service (MSS).
The Commission aims to make this spectrum available for new investment in mobile broadband networks while retaining sufficient market-wide MSS capability.
The NPRM makes two proposals. First, the Commission proposes to add primary Fixed and Mobile allocations to the 2000-2020 MHz and 2180-2200 MHz bands.
Second, the Commission proposes to apply its terrestrial secondary market spectrum leasing rules and procedures to transactions involving terrestrial use of MSS spectrum in the 2 GHz, Big LEO and L-bands.
In the NOI, the FCC launches a broader inquiry on further steps it can take to increase the value, utilization, innovation and investment in the spectrum for terrestrial services throughout the 2 GHz, Big LEO and L-bands, while ensuring that the U.S. market, as a whole, retains robust MSS capabilities.
2 GHz MSS Band Allocation Proposal. The Commission proposes adding to the table of allocations Fixed and Mobile allocations for the 2000-2020 MHz and 2180-2200 MHz bands that would be co-primary with the existing Mobile-Satellite allocation for these bands. Although this addition would not itself make any new licenses or services available in these bands, it would make possible future terrestrial licensing in this band that is not bound by the Commission's MSS/Ancillary Terrestrial Component (ATC) rules.
The Commission does not propose to change any of its rules regarding the relocations of incumbent BAS and FS licensees in this band, whose operations will still become secondary on December 9, 2013.
The addition of primary Fixed and Mobile allocations does not change the application of existing service rules for the MSS and ATC operations authorized in the 2 GHz band. Thus, existing licensees must continue to comply with these rules and any other terms of their licenses.
But the Commission indicates in the NPRM that if one or both of the 2 GHz MSS licenses were to be returned or cancelled for any reason, the returned spectrum could be used for Terrestrial Wireless Broadband deployment.
Indeed, if a 2 GHz MSS License is returned or cancelled, the spectrum covered by that license would not be assigned to the remaining licensee or made available for new MSS or other satellite services.
Proposal to Apply Secondary Market Rules and Procedures for Terrestrial Services in MSS Bands. The Commission's second proposal is to subject spectrum leasing arrangements between an MSS operator and a third party entity involving the use of MSS Spectrum for the provision of terrestrial services to the FCC's general Secondary Market Spectrum Leasing Policies and rules that currently apply to wireless terrestrial services.
The Commission specifically notes that this proposal would apply to all terrestrial use of MSS spectrum, which is currently limited to ATC operations, but in the future may include other terrestrial operations in the 2 GHz band pursuant to the new Fixed and Mobile allocations proposed above.
The secondary market rules would not apply to MSS Leasing arrangements that do not involve spectrum associated with terrestrial operations.
The Commission's secondary market rules allow exclusive licensees to lease some or all of their spectrum usage rights to third parties and provide for immediate approval procedures for leasing arrangements that do not raise potential public interest concerns, and streamlined review procedures for all other leasing arrangements.
Importantly, under the secondary market rules, all technical, interference, operational and other service rules applicable to the licensee apply to the spectrum lessee as well.
By subjecting MSS/ATC Spectrum Leasing arrangements to the secondary market rules, including the streamlined approval processes, the Commission expects that MSS licensees and their lessees will use their ATC Authority to provide mobile broadband services that are competitive with those offered by Terrestrial Mobile Broadband providers.
It is worth noting that the spectrum leases contemplated would still be constrained by the Commission's ATC rules, including the requirement that ATC operators offer an integrated service, which has generally required the use of dual-mode satellite/terrestrial mobile devices. Additionally, MSS/ATC lessees would be subject to other ATC service rules, such as those in place to protect adjacent services like Aeronautical Mobile-Satellite (Route) Service (AMS(R)S) and Global Positioning System (GPS).
The Commission proposes to require that leasing parties submit specified information and certifications in advance of consummating the proposed transaction and indicates that to the extent a proposed arrangement does not raise potential public interest concerns it would be subject to immediate processing or approval. However, the Commission seeks comment on what considerations should be taken into account when determining the potential competitive harms of a proposed transaction.
Recently, the Commission conditioned the acquisition by Harbinger Capital Partners Funds of L-band MSS provider SkyTerra on adherence to certain voluntary commitments that, among other provisions, limited the combined company's ability to enter into spectrum leasing arrangements with the two largest mobile operators.
Inquiry Regarding Use of the 2 GHz Band for Terrestrial Services. In the NOI, the FCC seeks comment on how best to encourage the growth of new mobile broadband services in the 2 GHz Band under the proposed co-primary Fixed and Mobile allocations in a way that will attract investment.
The Commission specifically requests comment on whether voluntary incentive auctions-if Congress were to grant such authority to the FCC-would be an appropriate mechanism to allow incumbent 2 GHz MSS licensees to vacate the band in favor of mobile broadband providers operating on new licenses.
Alternatively, the FCC also asks whether there are other approaches that could create licenses that would attract the substantial investment necessary to launch new mobile broadband services in the 2 GHz band and that are within the FCC's existing authority.
For example, the FCC asks whether existing 2 GHz MSS licensees should be given the option to return some of their spectrum (which could then be auctioned to new terrestrial licensees) while concurrently modifying the MSS licensees' authorizations to allow them to operate terrestrial networks under the proposed Fixed and Mobile allocations instead of under the current ATC service rules.
The Commission also asks whether, under any of these approaches, the opportunity to integrate the J Block and 2 GHz MSS Spectrum would help attract new investment and utilization of new mobile broadband networks in the 2 GHz band.
Inquiry Regarding All MSS Bands.
The Commission asks whether there are any other FCC actions that would increase terrestrial use of the MSS bands, particularly actions that would specifically apply to the Big LEO or L-bands.
The FCC asks whether there are incentives that it could apply to help ensure that the public receives the maximum benefits from the use of the spectrum.
In a footnote, the Commission references the various incentive proposals raised in the National Broadband Plan, including incentive auctions, spectrum fees and secondary market incentives.
In addition, the Commission requests comment on the deployment of satellite and terrestrial services in the MSS bands, both within the U.S. and internationally.
The Commission also asks how it should assess the current and future spectrum needs for MSS so that it can assure those needs continue to be met.
The Commission seeks comment on the extent to which such services can coexist with terrestrial uses in areas that do not rely as heavily upon MSS.
And the FCC also inquires as to how it can ensure that the U.S. continues to have market-wide MSS capabilities. "
"FCC Proposes to Remove Barriers to Terrestrial Use of MSS Spectrum
R. Michael Senkowski, Peter D. Shields and Jennifer D. Hindin
Today the Federal Communications Commission (FCC or the Commission) released a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) and Notice of Inquiry (NOI) seeking to remove regulatory barriers to terrestrial use in 90 megahertz of spectrum allocated to the Mobile Satellite Service (MSS).
The Commission aims to make this spectrum available for new investment in mobile broadband networks while retaining sufficient market-wide MSS capability.
The NPRM makes two proposals. First, the Commission proposes to add primary Fixed and Mobile allocations to the 2000-2020 MHz and 2180-2200 MHz bands.
Second, the Commission proposes to apply its terrestrial secondary market spectrum leasing rules and procedures to transactions involving terrestrial use of MSS spectrum in the 2 GHz, Big LEO and L-bands.
In the NOI, the FCC launches a broader inquiry on further steps it can take to increase the value, utilization, innovation and investment in the spectrum for terrestrial services throughout the 2 GHz, Big LEO and L-bands, while ensuring that the U.S. market, as a whole, retains robust MSS capabilities.
2 GHz MSS Band Allocation Proposal. The Commission proposes adding to the table of allocations Fixed and Mobile allocations for the 2000-2020 MHz and 2180-2200 MHz bands that would be co-primary with the existing Mobile-Satellite allocation for these bands. Although this addition would not itself make any new licenses or services available in these bands, it would make possible future terrestrial licensing in this band that is not bound by the Commission's MSS/Ancillary Terrestrial Component (ATC) rules.
The Commission does not propose to change any of its rules regarding the relocations of incumbent BAS and FS licensees in this band, whose operations will still become secondary on December 9, 2013.
The addition of primary Fixed and Mobile allocations does not change the application of existing service rules for the MSS and ATC operations authorized in the 2 GHz band. Thus, existing licensees must continue to comply with these rules and any other terms of their licenses.
But the Commission indicates in the NPRM that if one or both of the 2 GHz MSS licenses were to be returned or cancelled for any reason, the returned spectrum could be used for Terrestrial Wireless Broadband deployment.
Indeed, if a 2 GHz MSS License is returned or cancelled, the spectrum covered by that license would not be assigned to the remaining licensee or made available for new MSS or other satellite services.
Proposal to Apply Secondary Market Rules and Procedures for Terrestrial Services in MSS Bands. The Commission's second proposal is to subject spectrum leasing arrangements between an MSS operator and a third party entity involving the use of MSS Spectrum for the provision of terrestrial services to the FCC's general Secondary Market Spectrum Leasing Policies and rules that currently apply to wireless terrestrial services.
The Commission specifically notes that this proposal would apply to all terrestrial use of MSS spectrum, which is currently limited to ATC operations, but in the future may include other terrestrial operations in the 2 GHz band pursuant to the new Fixed and Mobile allocations proposed above.
The secondary market rules would not apply to MSS Leasing arrangements that do not involve spectrum associated with terrestrial operations.
The Commission's secondary market rules allow exclusive licensees to lease some or all of their spectrum usage rights to third parties and provide for immediate approval procedures for leasing arrangements that do not raise potential public interest concerns, and streamlined review procedures for all other leasing arrangements.
Importantly, under the secondary market rules, all technical, interference, operational and other service rules applicable to the licensee apply to the spectrum lessee as well.
By subjecting MSS/ATC Spectrum Leasing arrangements to the secondary market rules, including the streamlined approval processes, the Commission expects that MSS licensees and their lessees will use their ATC Authority to provide mobile broadband services that are competitive with those offered by Terrestrial Mobile Broadband providers.
It is worth noting that the spectrum leases contemplated would still be constrained by the Commission's ATC rules, including the requirement that ATC operators offer an integrated service, which has generally required the use of dual-mode satellite/terrestrial mobile devices. Additionally, MSS/ATC lessees would be subject to other ATC service rules, such as those in place to protect adjacent services like Aeronautical Mobile-Satellite (Route) Service (AMS(R)S) and Global Positioning System (GPS).
The Commission proposes to require that leasing parties submit specified information and certifications in advance of consummating the proposed transaction and indicates that to the extent a proposed arrangement does not raise potential public interest concerns it would be subject to immediate processing or approval. However, the Commission seeks comment on what considerations should be taken into account when determining the potential competitive harms of a proposed transaction.
Recently, the Commission conditioned the acquisition by Harbinger Capital Partners Funds of L-band MSS provider SkyTerra on adherence to certain voluntary commitments that, among other provisions, limited the combined company's ability to enter into spectrum leasing arrangements with the two largest mobile operators.
Inquiry Regarding Use of the 2 GHz Band for Terrestrial Services. In the NOI, the FCC seeks comment on how best to encourage the growth of new mobile broadband services in the 2 GHz Band under the proposed co-primary Fixed and Mobile allocations in a way that will attract investment.
The Commission specifically requests comment on whether voluntary incentive auctions-if Congress were to grant such authority to the FCC-would be an appropriate mechanism to allow incumbent 2 GHz MSS licensees to vacate the band in favor of mobile broadband providers operating on new licenses.
Alternatively, the FCC also asks whether there are other approaches that could create licenses that would attract the substantial investment necessary to launch new mobile broadband services in the 2 GHz band and that are within the FCC's existing authority.
For example, the FCC asks whether existing 2 GHz MSS licensees should be given the option to return some of their spectrum (which could then be auctioned to new terrestrial licensees) while concurrently modifying the MSS licensees' authorizations to allow them to operate terrestrial networks under the proposed Fixed and Mobile allocations instead of under the current ATC service rules.
The Commission also asks whether, under any of these approaches, the opportunity to integrate the J Block and 2 GHz MSS Spectrum would help attract new investment and utilization of new mobile broadband networks in the 2 GHz band.
Inquiry Regarding All MSS Bands.
The Commission asks whether there are any other FCC actions that would increase terrestrial use of the MSS bands, particularly actions that would specifically apply to the Big LEO or L-bands.
The FCC asks whether there are incentives that it could apply to help ensure that the public receives the maximum benefits from the use of the spectrum.
In a footnote, the Commission references the various incentive proposals raised in the National Broadband Plan, including incentive auctions, spectrum fees and secondary market incentives.
In addition, the Commission requests comment on the deployment of satellite and terrestrial services in the MSS bands, both within the U.S. and internationally.
The Commission also asks how it should assess the current and future spectrum needs for MSS so that it can assure those needs continue to be met.
The Commission seeks comment on the extent to which such services can coexist with terrestrial uses in areas that do not rely as heavily upon MSS.
And the FCC also inquires as to how it can ensure that the U.S. continues to have market-wide MSS capabilities. "
Source of MSS Spectrum Post
MSS Spectrum - Wiping Out Markets, Selling Air ?
FCC to Issue MSS Spectrum Proposed Rulemaking in July - MSS Spectrum News Archives
June 24th 2010
Spectrum Flexibility NPRM and NOI: A Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Notice of Inquiry seeking comment on ways to encourage investment in terrestrial broadband services within spectrum allocated to mobile satellite services, while maintaining robust mobile satellite capability.
Rural Health Care Reform NPRM: A Notice of Proposed Rulemaking initiating reforms to the Universal Service Rural Health Care Fund to expand the reach and use of broadband connectivity by health care providers throughout the nation.
Electronic Tariff Filing NPRM: A Notice of Proposed Rulemaking seeking comment on streamlining the tariff filing and formatting process by transitioning from paper to electronic filing to reduce industry burden and promote an open, transparent, and efficient flow of information. "
"WASHINGTON: Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski announced three items for possible consideration at the next open meeting. The meeting is scheduled for Thursday, July 15. The items include a notice of proposed rulemaking for reallocating 90 MHz of mobile satellite service spectrum for a wireless broadband network. The three are listed as follows:
Spectrum Flexibility NPRM and NOI: A Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Notice of Inquiry seeking comment on ways to encourage investment in terrestrial broadband services within spectrum allocated to mobile satellite services, while maintaining robust mobile satellite capability.
Rural Health Care Reform NPRM: A Notice of Proposed Rulemaking initiating reforms to the Universal Service Rural Health Care Fund to expand the reach and use of broadband connectivity by health care providers throughout the nation.
Electronic Tariff Filing NPRM: A Notice of Proposed Rulemaking seeking comment on streamlining the tariff filing and formatting process by transitioning from paper to electronic filing to reduce industry burden and promote an open, transparent, and efficient flow of information. "
Source of MSS Spectrum Post
http://www.televisionbroadcast.com/article/102562
http://www.televisionbroadcast.com/article/102562
FCC looks to MSS Spectrum for Broadband
"The Federal Communications Commission now has its sights set on freeing up spectrum allocated for satellite services as it continues its search for more spectrum to accommodate wireless broadband services under the National Broadband Plan announced in March.
As part of the broadband plan, the FCC wants to make 300 MHz of spectrum available for wireless broadband within the next five years and a total of 500 MHz in 10 years.
The commission has already talked up giving TV broadcasters incentives to give up about 120 MHz of Spectrum, and now it is targeting 90 MHz of spectrum in the Mobile Satellite Services band (MSS).
As part of the broadband plan, the FCC wants to make 300 MHz of spectrum available for wireless broadband within the next five years and a total of 500 MHz in 10 years.
The commission has already talked up giving TV broadcasters incentives to give up about 120 MHz of Spectrum, and now it is targeting 90 MHz of spectrum in the Mobile Satellite Services band (MSS).
Full MSS Spectrum Article and Post Source
http://www.fiercebroadbandwireless.com/story/fcc-looks-mss-spectrum-broadband/2010-06-20
http://news.cnet.com/8301-30686_3-20008211-266.html?tag=mncol;title
http://news.cnet.com/8301-30686_3-20008211-266.html?tag=mncol;title
Interesting Comments on this One on the FCC using airwaves, and charging Us for it, and your constitutional rights.
It's ALL about the FCC Plan of Internet for ALL, Everywhere...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)